From Manual Chaos
to Structured Enrollment

Redesigning healthcare workflows where every step matters.

Case Study

Lead Product Designer · 2024-2025

0%

faster enrollment

The Problem: Manual Everything

Healthcare enrollment was broken. Providers were spending hours on paperwork instead of patient care. Eligibility checks happened manually. Claims got rejected at high rates. There was no tracking, no automation, no visibility.

The problem wasn't policy. It was process.

I started with 30+ user interviews across providers, administrators, and clinicians. They all said the same thing: the system exists, but nobody has software to manage it.

Research: Understanding Real Workflows

User Interviews

I spent weeks talking to the people actually doing this work. Not stakeholders. Not executives. The staff manually processing enrollments, tracking eligibility, handling claims.

Key findings:

  • ✓ Enrollment process took 8 weeks on average (mostly waiting)
  • ✓ Staff didn't know eligibility rules — they guessed
  • ✓ Service tracking happened in spreadsheets
  • ✓ Claims were manually generated and submitted
  • ✓ No feedback loop on rejections

Validation Rate

After identifying core problems, I proposed solutions. Users validated them early and often.

12

Proposed Solutions

Weekly

User Testing Rounds

85%+

Validation Success

The Solution: Structured Workflow

I designed an enrollment platform that turns manual chaos into structured workflow. No guessing. No spreadsheets. Just step-by-step clarity.

Enrollment Platform — Patient Intake

First name

Eleanor

Last name

Whitfield

Patient ID

1EG4-TE5-MK72

Date of birth

03/14/1941

Key Design Decisions

Guided Intake

Step-by-step forms that ask the right questions in the right order. No confusion.

Real-time Eligibility

Instant feedback on patient eligibility. Staff know immediately if the patient qualifies.

Service Tracking

Built-in capacity management for services. No more spreadsheets tracking what services are available.

Automated Claims

Claims generated automatically from enrollment data. Submitted with 100% accuracy.

How I Worked

Validating with users on real prototypes. Designing and coding in parallel. Just:

1

Understand

Interview providers, document real workflows

2

Prototype

Design interactive prototypes, test with users

3

Code

Build it directly into the codebase with AI assistance.

4

Validate

Real feedback from real users on real product

5

Refine

Iterate based on metrics and user feedback

6

Ship

Deploy to production, measure impact

Claims Automation

Claim forms were manually entered and prone to errors. No feedback. High rejection rates.

The Solution

I designed an automated claims engine that generates claims directly from enrollment data, validates them against rules, and provides real-time feedback on submission status.

Claims — Automated Billing100% success rate

Click a claim to see validation rules

Design Details

  • Data-driven claims: Claims generated automatically from enrollment data, eliminating manual entry errors
  • Rule validation: Every claim validated against eligibility and formatting rules before submission
  • Transparent feedback: Staff see exactly what rules apply and why a claim was approved or flagged
  • No manual submission: Claims submitted automatically with complete accuracy and tracking

Impact

80%

Faster patient enrollment

This improvement came from solving the right problems with better design.

Eliminated manual entry

Structured intake forms replace unguided data collection

Real-time eligibility

Staff get instant feedback instead of waiting for answers

Automated claims

Claims submitted automatically without email delays

Transparent workflow

Staff know exactly what step comes next and why

The speed improvement is a byproduct of better design, not the goal. The goal was making the process work.

What I Learned

User interviews beat assumptions every time. We thought the problem was complex. It was simple: nobody had built software for this before.

Process Insights

  • Iteration on real product beats pixel-perfect mockups
  • Design and code working together solves problems fast
  • User validation early and often prevents building the wrong thing
  • Small, shipped features beat big, unfinished ones
  • Talk to end users, not just stakeholders

Want to build something that actually works?

I focus on understanding real problems and shipping real solutions.

Let's talk